Senin, 20 Juni 2011

sarah chalke wallpaper_22

images sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • dealsnet
    08-21 11:14 PM
    Nobody get any advantage from your situation. We are all very sad about your situation. Even legal IV members are forced to go home after loosing their job and after 6 years in H1B.
    You are here come not in any work visa catagory. Not even in NAFTA.
    You file your I-485 at the time of July 2007 visa fiasco.
    USCIS got 1 million application at that period. So they didn't made much scrutiny your application. If at normal time, you may get a fast RFE and subsequent denial.
    Because of work load it was not happened. I have read all of your previous threads in IV (REGARDING FINGER PRINT ETC). Your case is diffrent with the people here.
    You are ignorant regarding immigration. You have acess to comuter. Google it and get info.

    You are telling about I-485 only.
    YOU ARE NOT TELLING ABOUT I-140 (EMPLOYMENT BASED) OR I-130 (FAMILY BASED)
    IF you are not filed I-130 or I-140 at the time or before I-485, your petition is invalid.
    Except EB1, almost all EB based GC need labor process.

    If your I-94 date is expired and you are not extend it or change to any visa catagory at the time of I-485 filing, you are illegal. IT IS THE HARD TRUTH.
    USCIS will not adjust the status, if the petitioner is not legal at the time of I485 filing.
    After I-485 filing I-94 expiry is not a problem.
    Canada is next country. Why you didn't go back and come in NAFTA or other visa catagory ?

    Thank you to those of you who were kind enough to respond with helpful information and some understanding for my situation. I do appreciate that much.
    And for those of you who were sarcastic and rude and accusing me of being illegal, if that was the case, then why has USCIS not stated that one time in all the correspondence I have had from them and why are they willing to give me a chance to file the required forms at this time?
    They know where I live, who I live with and anything else they need to know. Illegal immigrants don't make themselves known to anybody that could/would report them. If I had something to hide, I would do so, but I have no secrets from them whatsoever. I have done all I have been asked to do and have the paperwork to prove it. I have not gotten a job anywhere outside of the home I live in and they are well aware of what I do here, I have not committed any crimes, my biometrics have come back clear, therefore I have no criminal record in my home country, so therefore I am not a threat whatsoever to anyone in the US.
    No one at USCIS has ever stated by phone or mail that I am here illegally and if that was the case, I would think they would have been quick to deport me since they knew everything they needed to know in order to find me and still do. I have nothing to hide.





    wallpaper sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • alterego
    07-13 09:28 AM
    I don't agree. It will stay same or forward in small increments with new fiscal yr numbers available. I am saying so because EB2 I stayed for such long at 04/07 and everyone knows fewer LCs were filed/approved between 04 and 05.

    Keep in mind two things. Many, quite possibly most of the July VB fiasco filed 485s have not been processed yet, Eb2 or EB3 India. There have been more recently (in the past couple of months) but still not most. A good number of those filers had earlier PDs.
    The quarterly statutory quota for EB2 I or C is so puny (something like 700 visas) that any movement would almost entirely be dependent on the Eb1 and EB2ROW overflow. That is why I feel, once this next two months pass, we will see dates back in 2004 for EB2. Maybe not quite back in April, but sometime in the middle to later 2004. However we could see PDs move at a healthy clip for EB2 I and C next year. It will take most of next years overflow to clear up the EB2 backlog in my view.





    sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke



  • anurakt
    12-26 09:01 AM
    I agree with this, we should also crate a section in craiglist for our area and put it....It's free and people do look at the postings....

    Craiglist is one of the best websites for local promotions.


    ??





    2011 sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • kondur_007
    06-08 06:03 PM
    That "small change" of EB2 China PD is very important. It suggests that there is going to be "Spill over" so EB2 India and China will have to move together to use the unused numbers. A good sign; at least EB1 retrogression does not seem to be likely and there will be some spill over numbers to EB2 India (EB2 china may not benefit much as it had a PD later than that for the rest of the year.

    Scorpion: how can you say "no spill over". EB2ROW is current and so spill over is likely (more likely from EB1 and even to some extent from EB2 ROW)
    Moreover, EB2 ROW remained current meaning that they have not used all their quota; they will not use any spillover numbers and they may even provide spill over numbers to EB2 India and China.



    more...


    sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • Daisy
    10-25 02:15 PM
    My EB3 India PD: March 2003
    June filer





    sarah chalke wallpaper_22. hot sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • hot sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • ItIsNotFunny
    11-11 06:03 PM
    Almost all my personal friends I spoke to recently who did not want to help with IV stuff, now proudly claim "As Obama has become the president, he will do something for us to get the green card"

    The hope continues :)

    People come on IV only to blame IV and admins for all the problems in their lives, but when asked to help for IV stuff - they give red dots and leave bad comments

    There will always be 2 types of people. Lets see and concentrate on people who are positive and move ahead.



    more...


    sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • gvenkat
    09-09 01:00 PM
    Unless there is a concrete effort just for EB3-I, Nothing is going to happen. It's just unfortunate that we are just a subset who are affected. In reality everyone else gets a GC in 5-6 years..





    2010 sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • Jbpvisa
    07-12 11:01 PM
    http://www.murthy.com/chertoff_murthy.html

    July 12, 2007

    VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
    Michael Chertoff, Esq.
    Secretary
    Department of Homeland Security


    RE: USCIS Decision to Reject I-485 Filings

    Dear Mr. Chertoff:

    It was a pleasure and an honor to meet with you and to share my views during your panel discussion at the Harvard Worldwide Congress June 15, 2007 in Washington, D.C. I understand and appreciate that the responsibility vested in you as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is no simple task. We applaud your service to our nation. After meeting with you personally and speaking with you, I am more convinced than ever that you will do the right thing for our country and for the people you serve, both in terms of securing our nation and in being the leader of the DHS, with over 20 federal agencies reporting to you, including the USCIS.

    Purpose of this Letter

    I am writing to you at this time to address recent actions by the USCIS to refuse to accept I-485 adjustment of status filing during July 2007 that are having significant impact upon the reliability of the legal immigration system in this country, as well as impacting legal foreign nationals and the many U.S. businesses that rely upon the work they perform.

    USCIS Decision Contradicts its Long Standing Procedure

    In contradiction of its own long standing policy and procedure, we understand that the USCIS, through its Director Gonzalez, contacted the U.S. Department of State (DOS) and requested or required the DOS to issue a �revised� Visa Bulletin on July 2, 2007. The USCIS then used the revised Bulletin to refuse to accept I-485 filings. This decision deprives thousands of foreign nationals, and their families, of the rights and privileges that are attendant to the I-485 filing.

    These Highly Skilled Professionals Followed All the Rules and Believe in the American Dream

    These professionals and their employers have played by our established immigration laws and rules. The vast majority of these thousands of potential applicants has a U.S. employer corporation, university or other business as a sponsor for permanent resident status. The exceptions from an employer are for those who are considered of �extraordinary ability� or whose work is in our �national interest.� Many of these applicants have completed their Bachelor�s, Master�s and/or PhD programs from U.S. universities. They believe in the opportunities of this great nation and strive to achieve the American Dream by following all the rules, working hard, paying taxes, and striving to do the right thing. They believe in this country, and rely upon our systems, our government, and our processes. Unfortunately, on July 2, 2007, we let them down. The USCIS abandoned its own system and long standing practices. This happened through manipulation of the use of visa numbers, insisting upon the issuance of a "revised visa bulletin," and instituting the USCIS policy of rejecting every employment-based I-485 that could have been filed during the month of July 2007.

    USCIS Decision Denies Substantive and Procedural Rights to Highly Skilled Workers and Their Employers - Many of Whom Have Already Suffered and Will Suffer Further Harm/ Injury

    Not only does the USCIS' action harm the individuals and employers involved, it undermines the reliability of our entire employment-based immigration system. The unexpected decision of the USCIS to refuse to accept any I-485 filings denies both substantive and procedural due process rights to would be applicants across the U.S. All of these applicants are employment based (EB) applicants who are primarily highly skilled professionals or experienced workers, that the U.S. seeks in high demand areas, including: science, technology, medicine, research, business, academia, and education.

    The harm in not accepting the filings in July 2007 goes beyond mere delay. In reliance upon the July Visa Bulletin, starting in mid-June 2007, these applicants took the steps necessary to prepare their filings and made decisions in reliance upon the USCIS accepting their filings during July 2007. In order to be present in the U.S., as required for these filings, many applicants and their families canceled travel plans abroad or arranged to return to the U.S. on short notice missing family weddings and other important life events. They undertook medical examinations and paid for the required tests which must accompany the I-485 filings. (The USCIS had refused to waive this requirement even temporarily.) They hired lawyers to process their paperwork; they arranged to obtain documents from abroad on an expedited basis, involving foreign lawyers and foreign governments, all at a significant cost. They made employment and other strategic immigration related decisions to be able to process their I-485s for them and their families. Some canceled visa appointments at the consulates, or withdrew other immigration filings, all in reliance upon the USCIS accepting I-485 filings during July 2007.

    The applicants and their employers lose the rights and privileges that accompany the filing of the I-485. These include eligibility for the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and Advanced Parole (AP), thus eliminating the need for the individuals and their employers to make the filings necessary to maintain a non-immigrant, temporary status. These same ancillary benefits also apply to dependant family members. Most importantly, those that have not filed I-485s are not eligible for "portability" benefits under the �American Competitiveness in the Twenty First Century Act� of Oct. 2000 or �AC21� as it is sometimes referred to. This ineligibility for AC21 portability forces career stagnation. This is to the detriment of the individual as well as their sponsoring employer. Under AC21 portability, employers can promote and/or relocate employees to positions that are the same or similar job classifications as the positions for which they were initially sponsored. Individuals can utilize these provisions for career advancement, and for entrepreneurship. Given that the green card process often spans many years, AC21 portability allows the necessary flexibility to permit the case to continue, to accommodate changes in the sponsoring employer's needs as well as opportunities that are specific to the beneficiary.

    The list of stories of individuals and families harmed by the USCIS decision is endless. We have for example, many spouses who will now be separated potentially for years on end, as one received a green card during the USCIS' June "rush," while the other is now ineligible to file.

    The USCIS decision also created a burden on U.S. employers. Further delays in the green card process mean that, at best, U.S. employers have to continue to file temporary petitions to keep their workforce in the U.S. legally; at worst, it jeopardizes the availability of this needed highly educated and skilled workforce.

    USCIS Motive is to Collect Millions of Additional Filing Fees

    Many are baffled by the USCIS decision to reject I-485 filings in July, and its use of the �revised� Visa Bulletin as an excuse. The suspected motive is the collection of the substantially higher filing fees that will be generated after July 27, 2007. This entire incident sends the wrong message about our government, our policies and our legal system reeking of greed and inconsistency. Even the appearance of such impropriety undermines our system.

    .................
    continue



    more...


    sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22



  • californian_GC
    01-16 12:11 PM
    I signed up through my BOA account. I made $20 recurring payments for the next 12 months.





    hair sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • feedfront
    10-13 01:53 PM
    Hi,

    The response to my RFE reached USCIS on 10/12 at 9 am and I haven't got any online status update as of now - 10/13 1 pm EST. Should I be worried or does it generally take them some time to update their records. Just want to make sure that the RFE reached USCIS since the due date for RFE response is coming up soon.

    Thanks.

    If you have doc that response to RFE reached USCIS on time, then do not worry about it. It may take time to update record.



    more...


    sarah chalke wallpaper_22. hairstyles sarah chalke
  • hairstyles sarah chalke



  • nojoke
    10-20 11:55 AM
    He doesn't compare with Mccain on any of the issues except being able to talk. He spends more money running negative ads than Mccain. Then he says, john, 100% of your ads are negative where as only 50% of mine are negative. Which is true but if you dig further Mccain is spending 1bout 50Mil on negative ads where as Obama is spending 80Mil. Though he is correct in his percentages statement,is he really correct?

    Any time any question is raised , call them slimy is another strategy of Obama. He did it with Clintons and he is doing with Mccain.

    Give me an ad like "he is palling around with ...". Or "he is teaching sex for babies..." or..
    I can go on. Obama has highlighted healthcare policy differences. That is not negative ad. The only negative ad I have seen is " he is erratic.."





    hot sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • desi3933
    03-17 07:36 AM
    Hello Desi,
    .....
    ......

    This is from April Visa Bulletin , according to this S korea got 14,211 visas from FB ( spill over from FB - EB) then dont you think the total EB visas issued in 2009 should be around 150000 instead of 141000....

    I am little confused...

    your comment will be greatly appreciated ;)

    http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/FY09AnnualReport_TableV.pdf

    Country EB1 EB2 EB3
    India 6672 10124 2306
    China 4999 3046 1027
    S Korea 2311 4991 4001
    Philippines 524 1853 5540
    Mexico 2010 922 3745

    All visa numbers allocated to South Korea are against EB visa numbers.


    _________________
    Not a legal advice.



    more...


    house sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • newuser
    10-20 01:27 PM
    Faxed





    tattoo hot sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • yganreddy
    05-09 12:06 AM
    Hi

    Atlast I received My Welcome notice on 05/05/08 morning. First I received Card Production order and after couple of hours I received Welcome notice mailed. Today I received Approval Notice sent mail at 5:00 PM

    Thank you very much for all the information provided in forum. It was a great help. I will stick around.

    My details

    EB2 02/2003 (India) - TSC
    Sent 485 on : Jun 29th 2007
    Received on : Jul 02 2007
    Notice Date : Aug 24 2007
    Soft LUD on 485 : 12/07/2007
    Card production ordered mail : May 05 2008

    Contributed so for $100.00. Will contribute more.



    more...


    pictures sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • lvinaykumar
    05-21 10:15 AM
    Congrats, Please keep supporting IV





    dresses sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • shivaz90
    07-13 11:44 AM
    Reading through this thread I find this intense debate about the value and intentions of Murthy's letter.

    Let's first deal with the value part: This letter could be from any one of us or anybody else from Timbuktu. Why does this letter have any special significance except that the DHS secretary may read it because Murthy and the secretary are alumni of the same institution (see how carefully this part is added to the letter for our consumption). Now this feeds into the intention part. Even if Murthy wrote a letter to the DHS Secretary why did she have to publicize it on her website (except for the gullible among us to take notice). Generally publicized letters have value if they are from some influential policy maker or lawmaker. In this case Murthy is neither and so her letter does not add or subtract any value to this debate. So we are left with the question of who gains by publicizing this letter. Your guess is as good as mine.

    Ultimately I am left wondering why this thread was started in the first place except to garner cheap publicity. Do we really have so much time on our hands?

    "Why does Murthy publicize such a letter?" - well it means that she has a client base who needs to know what she is doing in her capacity as thier attorney. Second - there are thousands of Murthy.com members who are neither her client nor her well wishers - but who go to her site to find what is going on latest in the world of Immigration. Not to discredit anyone's effort in this issue - ask any immigrant or potential immigrant into this country about immigration related question, I can guarantee you that they have gained almost all thier knowledge about the process from Murthy.com site. Intended or unintended - the message to DHS is welcome, particularly at this time, be it from whoever.

    Anyone who has been a regular murthy.com visitor knows that her site consists of all her interactions with all the Agency people and government officials regarding immigration. Its called the "Internet". People post stuff - period! If it is meant to garner attention, yes, people will post messages. Its far better than a bunch of goof balls posting in youtube about thier experience with coke and spearmint. Please come out of the caves - people.



    more...


    makeup sarah chalke wallpaper_22 sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • smuggymba
    09-10 08:36 AM
    I understand what you said, but just to consider the off numbers published by dos

    http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf


    EB2 total pending 34325
    EB3 total pending 136325


    2010-2011 quota EB1+EB2 ( 85343 )
    less eb2 " " 34325
    --------------------------------------------
    " " 51018 trickeling down for EB3 Worldwide?
    2010-2011 quota EB3 ( 42671 )
    less eb3 - 136325
    --------------------------------------------
    42636 ( eb3 pending left over from above )
    2011-2012 quota eb1+eb2+eb3 128013

    So, with above math Eb2 will be current by next year, and eb3 will be by end of 2012?

    above math is based on
    inaccurate numbers given by DOS?
    assuming no new applicants applying.
    Hope I am correct! :)


    Hi Sanju-dba,
    In the predictions thread, I saw the members saying there are 100-120K people waiting in EB2 from now until 2010. You're saying it's 34K...can u post this in the predictions thread so that other members can analyze the numbers. Thanks.





    girlfriend sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • tabletpc
    12-20 04:28 PM
    Have you been out of country anytime after this...??If yes then you are fine.

    Once you re-enter US..all previous records will be cleared....!!!





    hairstyles hairstyles sarah chalke sarah chalke wallpaper_22. sarah chalke wallpaper_22.
  • sarah chalke wallpaper_22.



  • ashishgour
    09-10 02:03 PM
    Guess they had an extended lunch session...!!! Finally back..but no discussion yet...





    DDD
    03-14 12:06 AM
    If ya'll do like a character model contest next time, I think I will be in. But we will need like a 4 week due date...lol. Good job all.





    swo
    08-16 01:40 PM
    Hi, do you know how long it took them to clear name check? which EB category /country are you? Mine is stuck in name check and am trying to find some pattern and if possible, some solace.. thanks.

    Your case is unique. Either it will get through quickly or it won't.

    BROADLY SPEAKING, 90% of cases take 6 months of less to get through name check. Some take longer. Depending on how common your name and it's variatiosn are, and depending on whether or not there are hits in the FBIs database, that will determine how it goes for you. Some are through in 2 weeks. Some in 2 years.

    Sadly, it's not predictable in any way.



    Tidak ada komentar:

    Posting Komentar